Bade Acche Lagte Hain: Priya and Ram help reunite Vikram and Neha

Last Updated: 11.06 AM IST 01.22.2013
Bade Acche Lagte Hain: Priya and Ram help reunite Vikram and Neha
Sign up for the BL newsletter!

Phew! At last, there’s some satisfaction in watching this melodramatic show

For months, we pondered on why the lovely couple Vikram (Jai Kalra) and Neha (Taraana Raja) of Bade Acche Lagte Hain decided to go for a divorce. When we found out the answer, it sure as hell shocked the daylights out of us.

Every relationship has a phase – good and bad, and we heard that the bad just got over for Vikram and Neha. In a desperate attempt to reunite the couple, Priya (Sakshi Tanwar) and Ram (Ram Kapoor) stage a fake marriage for Neha. When Vikram hears about it, he is up in arms and all ready to stop the wedding. Awww, now isn’t that cute?

Like how they solve all their problems, Vikram and Neha have a yelling match at the marriage registrar’s office. After repeated apologies, they confess their love to one another and decide to tackle the ‘Rehaan’ issue together like a couple. Well, if you haven’t died of diabetes, then hold on since, there’s more.

On seeing the love bloom between Neha and Vikram, Priya runs into Ram’s arms in full filmi ishtyle. Trust us when we say we were rolling on the floor laughing at this. We were just glad that it was not Ram running into Priya’s arms – If you know what we mean!

So all’s well that ends well – Neha and Vikram are back together. Let’s hope they manage to reunite Ram and Priya. Now wouldn’t we want to see just that!

First Published: 6.00 PM IST 01.13.2013

Leave a Reply

To comment, please fill in the fields below, enter your comment and select the Comment button.

View Comment

  • Amita

    Posted at 11:02 PM on January 13, 2013  

    It’s so comforting to watch Bade Ache Lagte hai . After a long day we look forward to seeing a serial with pleasant characters and a story line that shows love and emotion and a relationship that is being nurtured between Ram and Priya .

    Share this comment at