Also Read
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Login
Login
Yesterday, we told you how Mumbai Police came out with a circular that pointed out 16 discrepancies in the way the 2002 Hit and Run case was handled. This discovery raises a lot of questions about the case. Salman Khan was the accused in the 2002 Hit and Run case which resulted in a death of a person. Others were also severely injured when his car rammed into a bakery in Bandra. Last year, the Mumbai Sessions Court found the actor guilty and awarded him five years of imprisonment which the superstar challenged in Bombay HC. The latter acquitted him of all the charges. But it instructed Salman to deposit two sureties of 25000 under section 437-A of CrPC to confirm his presence if the State appeals in the Supreme Court against the Bombay HC's decision. However, the actor sought some more time as a lot of paperwork was left which made the Court grant him an extension of two more weeks. Justice A M Thipsay gave him the extension.
Also Read
Also Read
Also Read
According to a daily, Justice A R Joshi had mentioned in his order that, "The bail procedure be complied before the office of this Court." Last month, Public prosecutor A A Mane pointed out that the bail procedure post acquittal has to be completed before the trial court and Justice Sadhna Jadhav of the Bombay HC who presided over Salman's appeal for more time, complied with the prosecutor and stated, " In normal circumstances, the procedure has to be completed before the trial Court. She instructed the HC registry to remit all concerned papers to the trial Court forthwith. The HC order on December 22, 2015, had said, "The procedure be completed before the trial Court within three weeks from today."
The entire process will be conducted at the Session's court.
